🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are increasingly enabling the far right to dictate the public discourse, as per a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited radical groups by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Reporting

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from six national publications.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to central subjects like assimilation and migration, mainstream parties increasingly adjusted their messaging in response.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these ideas and indicated to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Political discourse by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when mainstream groups were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Across the Continent

While the research was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to countries across the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, leaders have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then national leader called for large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar instances can be found across the continent, as politicians from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to France embrace the language of the radical right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about societal topics – immigration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a study author.

Other parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the radical right, despite research suggests that this approach leads voters to vote for the radical faction.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of data collected showed that the influence of far-right groups had been progressive and had increased over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "But if you encounter this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Groups to Develop Their Distinct Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for established parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on subjects such as migration and assimilation, instead of continuously following the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is far-right and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."